MAS and Partners Submit Brief to NY Supreme Court
November 4th, 2009
The Municipal Art Society of New York, along with six civic organizations, today filed a brief with the New York Supreme Court as amici curiae, or friends of the court, to assist the court in resolving the issues presented in Protect the Village Historic District, et. al, v. New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, et. al.
The case arises from the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission’s (LPC) determination that St. Vincent’s met the judicial test for hardship and could proceed with the demolition of its Edward and Theresa O’Toole Building, on Seventh Avenue between 12th and 13th streets. The Commission reached its preliminary determination in October of 2008, and issued its Final Notice to Proceed in May of 2009.
Joining MAS in filing the brief are the New York Landmarks Conservancy, The National Trust for Historic Preservation, The Preservation League of New York State, The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, The Brooklyn Heights Association and Friends of the Upper East Side Historic Districts.
In filing the brief, MAS and other amici have taken the uncommon step of supporting neither party to the litigation. The primary function of the submission is to assist the court in reaching its determination by outlining the proper judicial test for hardship relief, as well as the regulatory takings analysis on which that test is premised. Continue Reading>>






In honor of
The New York City Council will hold a public hearing next Monday, January 26, at 1:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall on Intro. 623 which proposes to allow advertising on sidewalk construction sheds for a yet to be determined permit fee. The Municipal Art Society will testify against this ill-conceived plan. [Read MAS press release
The Municipal Art Society hosted its third Continuing Legal Education (CLE) course of the fall earlier today. Commercial Uses of Parkland: The Law Governing New York’s Open Spaces, was moderated by Michael Gruen, Esq. and co-sponsored by the Environmental Law Section and Historic Preservation and Parks Committee of the New York State Bar Association, focused on issues surrounding the use and alienation of parks in New York City and State. Panelists highlighted the significant case law, doctrine, and policy concerns that shape and determine New York parks and commercial uses within them.
The impact of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) is being felt throughout the country as municipalities must reconsider their planning for, and zoning of, religious institutions under the threat of RLUIPA litigation. The Act’s contentious origins aside, RLUIPA is now a well established law with tremendous implications and MAS has organized a continuing legal education (CLE) program to discuss the federal statute’s constitutionality and its influence on local governments next Wednesday, October 23.
On March 25, the New York State Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that an East Village developer could not build a 19 story dormitory without a commitment from an educational institution. The decision dealt a major blow to unscrupulous developers and signaled a major step forward in the protection of a New York City-designated landmark school building.
While MAS’ lawsuit was ultimately unsuccessful in its attempt to require a Section 106 review that would examine the advisability of paving over the historic working graving dock, MAS urges you to Send a letter to IKEA and ask them to be a good corporate neighbor. They should share the history of this important site by providing boat tours and space to exhibit the history of the shipyards. Ask them to not sever the piers from the shore and provide landing rights for ships and barges. And make sure they live up to their obligations to hire local residents to work in the store and as contractors, and to provide a ferry dock with universal landing, at which many different designs of ferries and boats can dock.